All you need to know about CE Marking

What Will It Really Be Like to Own an Electric Car in 2030?

A City That Already Lives In The Future

In the summer of 2025, the Dutch city of Utrecht quietly became the first city in Europe where electric cars power the neighbourhood — not just move through it.

Fifty Renault 5 E-Tech models, available through a local car-sharing service, spend their parked hours feeding electricity back into the city grid. When the sun floods Utrecht’s solar panels — installed on 35% of its rooftops — the cars charge. When demand peaks in the evening, they give it back. The cars are not just transport. They are infrastructure.

Robin Berg, the man who started this from his Utrecht home in 2016 with a company called We Drive Solar, put it bluntly at an EV summit last autumn: “The grid has so much more capacity than what we are using. All these cars have such a huge capacity.” The plan is to scale to 500 bidirectional vehicles, enough to provide 10% of the flexibility the Utrecht region needs to balance its renewable energy. King Willem-Alexander of the Netherlands installed the city’s first bidirectional charging station back in 2019. What seemed ceremonial then is operational now.

This is not a pilot. It is the future, already running. (IEEE Spectrum has documented the technical and human story behind Utrecht’s V2G journey in depth.)

When most people imagine the future of electric cars, they picture something different. They picture a car that drives itself.

Autopilot: The Dream, and the European Reality

The fantasy of the self-driving car is real — in certain places. On long American highways, with wide lanes, clear markings, and generous sight lines, Tesla’s Full Self-Driving system handles significant portions of a journey with minimal input. It is imperfect. It still requires supervision. But on a Nevada highway at 3am, it is demonstrably useful.

In Europe, the picture is different — and that difference is structural, not temporary.

European cities were not designed for cars. They were designed for people, horses, and centuries of organic urban growth. Streets in Bologna are 4 metres wide. Intersections in Paris require negotiation, not calculation. Cyclists appear from directions that no algorithm has yet learned to anticipate with full reliability. Roundabouts — ubiquitous in the UK and the Netherlands — remain one of the hardest challenges for autonomous systems.

Tesla has been trying to bring Full Self-Driving to Europe for years. As of early 2026, the company is still navigating national approvals through the Dutch vehicle authority RDW, hoping that a Netherlands green light could unlock broader EU recognition — a process described by a former Tesla executive as potentially slipping to 2028 due to regulatory complexity, liability frameworks, and fragmented national rules. The RDW itself has been careful not to commit to dates under public pressure. (Electrek has followed this closely.)

Even when FSD does arrive in Europe, its real-world utility will be more limited than in North America. Highway stretches between cities? Yes. Urban cores of Amsterdam, Barcelona, or Rome? Not in any meaningful way for many years.

The self-driving dream is not the most interesting thing happening in European EVs right now. The bidirectional charger is.

Plug & Charge Will Be Mandatory

One of the most underrated changes coming to the European EV experience has no drama attached to it. It is simply this: you pull up to a charger, plug in, and the transaction happens automatically. No app. No card. No account. The car identifies itself, authorises the session, and charges.

This is called Plug & Charge, and it is built on the ISO 15118 standard — a communication protocol that allows the vehicle and the charger to authenticate each other directly. It sounds simple. The engineering behind it is not.

Under the EU’s Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Regulation (AFIR), Plug & Charge is becoming a mandatory feature of public charging infrastructure across Europe. The regulation sets binding requirements for charging station operators — on authentication, payment, data formats, and interoperability — that are reshaping what every public charger on the continent must be capable of doing.

For drivers, the impact is small and enormous at the same time: the friction of charging disappears. For charger manufacturers, it is an engineering and certification challenge requiring hardware redesign, PLC communication chips, and compliance with a protocol that is still being updated. ISO 15118-20, the latest version, extends bidirectional communication — meaning the charger and vehicle can not only authenticate but negotiate the terms of energy flow in both directions.

This is where AFIR, V2G, and the daily EV experience converge into a single infrastructure story.

Understanding the regulatory framework behind it — what AFIR requires, when it applies, and what it means for manufacturers of charging equipment — is covered in detail on our AFIR and ISO 15118 page.

Your Car as a Power Plant: V2G and V2H

Utrecht is the proof of concept. But the technology is now moving into private hands.

Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) allows an EV to discharge energy back into the electricity grid, typically managed by an aggregator who pays the car owner for the service. Vehicle-to-Home (V2H) is simpler: the car powers your house directly, bypassing the grid entirely. During a blackout. During peak tariff hours. During a sunny afternoon when your solar panels are producing more than you consume.

Renault is already deploying V2G-capable models commercially in France — the R5, Mégane E-Tech, R4, and Scenic E-Tech all support bidirectional charging via Mobilize technology. Volkswagen is running a V2G trial in Hudiksvall, Sweden, with 200 ID. vehicles and 200 bidirectional DC chargers in partnership with Vattenfall. Hyundai and Kia are scaling bidirectional capability across their European and North American lineup, including the Kia EV9 and upcoming Ioniq 9.

The financial case is emerging but not yet mature. V2G revenue depends heavily on local grid tariff structures, and regulatory fragmentation across EU member states — different tax rules, different grid fees, different certification pathways — remains the primary barrier to scale. Renault’s energy director has called openly for harmonised rules: “With the right alignment, V2G can become a cornerstone of tomorrow’s grid.”

What is not in doubt is the direction. A car that earns money while parked is not a science fiction concept. It is running in Utrecht today.

The Battery That Changes Everything — If It Arrives

The biggest single leap in the EV experience between now and 2030 will not come from software or regulation. It will come from chemistry.

All-solid-state batteries replace the liquid electrolyte in conventional lithium-ion cells with a solid material. The implications are significant: higher energy density (up to 450–500 Wh/kg versus roughly 250–300 Wh/kg today), faster charging, dramatically reduced fire risk, and longer lifespan. The most cited targets — 1,000+ km of range, 10-minute charging from near-empty — would eliminate what is left of range anxiety as a purchasing objection.

Toyota, in partnership with Sumitomo Metal Mining and Idemitsu Kosan, is targeting the world’s first commercial all-solid-state battery EV for 2027–2028, initially in Lexus flagship models. The Toyota-Idemitsu partnership is building a production plant for lithium sulfide — a key solid electrolyte precursor — capable of 1,000 metric tons annually. Mercedes has already driven an EQS fitted with a solid-state battery prototype for 1,205 km in a single run. CATL and BYD are targeting commercial launches around 2027 as well.

The honest footnote: Toyota has promised solid-state batteries by 2020, then 2023, then 2026. The technology has slipped before, and competitors on the road (Mercedes test mileage, Chinese semi-solid-state models already in production) are providing real competitive pressure. The 2027 target has more infrastructure behind it than previous ones — production agreements, material supply chains, regulatory approvals in Japan. But scepticism is reasonable until production vehicles exist.

If it arrives on schedule, the upgrade cycle for EVs between 2027 and 2032 will be one of the most significant in automotive history. (Toyota’s official newsroom sets out the full detail of the Idemitsu partnership and timeline.)

Europe Steps Back — But the Market Doesn’t Notice

A note on politics, because it would be misleading to omit it.

The European Union revised its 2035 target for the end of combustion engine sales. The original goal — 100% zero-emission new cars — was softened to 90%, preserving a lane for hybrid and low-emission combustion vehicles. It was a political concession to car-producing member states and a recognition that the charging infrastructure rollout has been uneven across the continent.

The revision matters for car manufacturers’ planning cycles. It does not appear to be changing the trajectory of the market. European EV sales grew to over 20% of new registrations in early 2026. The infrastructure investment commitments — from Volkswagen, Renault, Stellantis, and national governments — are already in motion. Consumers who switched to EVs are not switching back.

The market, in short, has developed its own momentum. The regulatory revision is a timeline adjustment, not a reversal.

What This Means If You Make Chargers

For manufacturers of charging equipment, the consumer story above translates into a set of very concrete engineering and regulatory obligations.

Plug & Charge is not a feature to add. Under AFIR, it is mandatory. ISO 15118 compliance — including the authentication and communication stack — is a hardware and software requirement that must be met before products can be deployed in the European market. ISO 15118-20, adding bidirectional communication, is the next step in the same mandatory direction.

The companies that will win the European charging infrastructure market over the next five years are not those with the fastest chargers. They are those who understood the regulatory framework early, built compliant hardware, and obtained the necessary certifications before the deadlines. Those who are late are already late.

If you are a charging equipment manufacturer assessing your ISO 15118 or AFIR compliance obligations, or a vehicle manufacturer navigating the intersection of AFIR, V2G capability, and CE marking, request a consultation — we can map the specific requirements for your product and market.

2030: What It Actually Feels Like

The EV owner in 2030 does not think about charging. The car identified itself at the motorway stop, started and ended the session, and sent the receipt to the app she forgot she had. The battery — if Toyota or one of its competitors delivered on schedule — took 12 minutes to go from near-empty to 80%.

On a Tuesday evening, when electricity demand spiked across the region, her car sold 8 kWh back to the grid and earned enough to cover the cost of the previous week’s charging.

The streets of her city still have narrow corners and unpredictable cyclists. The car does not drive itself through them. It parks itself in the garage.

The autonomous highway dream is real, somewhere. The bidirectional charger in the garage is real, right here.

That is the actual future of the electric car in Europe. It was always more interesting than the autopilot.

Category: AFIR- ISO 15118
Tags: AFIR electric vehicle regulation, autonomous driving Europe limitations, bidirectional charging Europe, electric car future Europe 2030, EV charging future, Plug and Charge ISO 15118, solid state battery EV 2027, vehicle to grid V2G

Looking for human beings to handle this? Here we are.